Property Address:
123 Bayou Blvd
Oregon City OR 99999
Gregory P. Felten
232 NE Shephard Ave.
Stevenson, WA 98648
208.598.3500
Property Address 123 Bayou Blvd Oregon City OR 99999 | Date of Inspection 7/1/2022 | Report ID |
Customer(s) Tom Petty | Time of Inspection 09:00 AM | Real Estate Agent |
Standards of Practice: InterNACHI International Association of Certified Home Inspectors | Type of building:: Single Family (2-story) | Approximate Square Footage:: 2000 |
Approximate Year of Original Construction:: 2021 | Inspection started at:: 9am | Inspection ended at:: 10:30am |
Occupancy:: The home was occupied | Present during the Inspection:: The home occupant(s) | Weather during the Inspection:: Clear |
Significant precipitation in last 3 days:: No | Temperature during inspection:: Over 65 (F) = 18 (C) | Ground/Soil surface condition: Dry |
Comment Key or Definitions
The following definitions of comment descriptions represent this inspection report. All comments by the inspector should be considered before purchasing this home. Any recommendations by the inspector to repair or replace suggests a second opinion or further inspection by a qualified contractor. All costs associated with further inspection fees and repair or replacement of item, component or unit should be considered before you purchase the property.
Inspected (IN) = I visually observed the item, component or unit and if no other comments were made then it appeared to be functioning as intended allowing for normal wear and tear.
Not Inspected (NI)= I did not inspect this item, component or unit and made no representations of whether or not it was functioning as intended and will state a reason for not inspecting.
Not Present (NP) = This item, component or unit is not in this home or building.
Monitor (M) = This item, component or unit should be monitored for continued deterioration.
Repair or Replace (RR) = The item, component or unit is not functioning as intended, or needs further inspection by a qualified contractor. Items, components or units that can be repaired to satisfactory condition may not need replacement.
232 NE Shephard Ave.
Stevenson, WA 98648
208.598.3500
Customer
Tom Petty
Address
123 Bayou Blvd
Oregon City OR 99999
4.0 | GFCI/AFCI Electrical Receptacles | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
Electrical receptacles in the basement had ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection,
most of which responded to testing in a satisfactory manner. The inspector tested a
representative number of accessible receptacles only.
An exterior Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI) electrical receptacle at the rear of the home responded to the testing device but failed to reset properly and stay reset. This receptacle should be replaced with a new GFCI receptacle. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be completed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 4.0 Item 1(Picture) Rear GFCI failed to reset properly
![]() 4.0 Item 2(Picture) Bathroom GFCI
|
4.3 | Switches | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of electrical switches tested in the
home. In accordance with the Standards of Practice, the inspector tested a representative
number of accessible switches only.
The inspector observed a slow to respond switch in the the main floor bathroom that may be defective or installed incorrectly and should be repaired. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be completed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 4.3 Item 1(Picture) Interior switches
![]() 4.3 Item 2(Picture) Interior switch
![]() 4.3 Item 3(Picture) Main floor bathroom light switch responds slowly and may be defective
|
5.0 | Drainage System | |
Inspected, Monitor, Repair/Replace | ||
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the roof drainage system.
Debris visible in the gutters at the time of the inspection should be removed to encourage proper drainage. The front porch downspout designed to discharge roof drainage was damaged to an extent that may limit its ability to function as designed. This condition can result in excessively high moisture levels in soil at the foundation and can cause damage related to soil/foundation movement. Excessive moisture levels in soil near the foundation can effect the ability of the soil to support the weight of the structure above and can cause damage related to soil/foundation movement. The Inspector recommends repair to help protect the home structure. All work should be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 5.0 Item 1(Picture) Roof drainage discharge spout damaged
![]() 5.0 Item 2(Picture) Gutter debris
|
6.1 | Floors | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of most floors in the home.
The home had general minor carpet wear on major paths of travel. All work should be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 6.1 Item 1(Picture) Nail protruding in master bathroom closet
![]() 6.1 Item 2(Picture) Tile flooring
![]() 6.1 Item 3(Picture) Floor creaks under foot near office area
![]() 6.1 Item 4(Picture) Composite flooring
|
6.2 | Windows | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed few deficiencies in the interior condition
and operation of windows.
Sealant around windows is cracked and needs to be repaired/replaced to prevent air leakage at the windows. Homes without an effective seal against air leakage at windows will incur higher annual heating/cooling costs and occupants may experience lower comfort levels than with a similar home with windows that are effectively sealed. The trim facade has fallen from the living room blinds and needs to be repaired. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified
contractor. ![]() 6.2 Item 1(Picture) Interior window sills need sealant
![]() 6.2 Item 2(Picture) Interior window sills need sealant
![]() 6.2 Item 3(Picture) Trim facade has fallen off
|
6.5 | Doors | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the interior doors.
Difficulty in operating the sliding closet doors in the bedroom appeared to be caused by worn or out-of-adjustment rollers. The Inspector recommends service by a qualified contractor. The interior doors in the home have rough surfaces that catch on clothing and should be repaired. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 6.5 Item 1(Picture) Doors have rough surfaces
![]() 6.5 Item 2(Picture) Door does not slide
|
7.5 | Shower | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
Most shower components in the bathroom appeared to be in serviceable condition at the time
of the inspection. Inspection of the shower typically includes:
The shower had functional flow and functional drainage at the time of the inspection. Transitions between the shower basin and the walls/flooring appeared to be old/cracked/deteriorated/missing and in need of sealant maintenance. This area is actively leaking onto the floor when the shower is used. The Inspector recommends application of an appropriate sealant to the entire basin to avoid moisture damage to adjacent home structure materials. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 7.5 Item 1(Picture) Shower
![]() 7.5 Item 2(Picture) Shower sealant needed/active leaking
![]() 7.5 Item 3(Picture) Shower sealant needed/active leaking
|
8.0 | Cabinets | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of kitchen cabinets and countertops.
The kitchen corner cabinet has a broken shelf that needs repair. In the kitchen, countertops had no backsplash sealant. The Inspector recommends application of an appropriate sealant to prevent damage to the cabinet and wall structure from moisture intrusion. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified
contractor. ![]() 8.0 Item 1(Picture) Cabinets and countertops
![]() 8.0 Item 2(Picture) Backsplash sealant needed
![]() 8.0 Item 3(Picture) Cabinet shelf damage
|
12.0 | GEN<Crawlspace | |
Inspected, Repair/Replace | ||
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of this crawlspace. Inspection of the
crawlspace typically includes examination of the following:
A radon mitigation system was in place in the crawlspace. Confirmation of proper system installation and operation lies beyond the scope the General Home Inspection. The Inspector recommends inspection by a certified/qualified contractor. No soil cover was installed at the time of the inspection. Soil covers help reduce humidity levels in crawlspaces by limiting moisture evaporation into the air from soil. Reducing humidity levels can help prevent conditions that encourage mold growth and wood decay. ![]() 12.0 Item 1(Picture) Crawlspace access
![]() 12.0 Item 2(Picture) Vapor barrier missing
![]() 12.0 Item 3(Picture) Vapor barrier
![]() 12.0 Item 4(Picture) Passive radon mitigation
|
The General Home Inspection does not include inspection of landscape irrigation systems, fencing or swimming pools/spas unless pre-arranged as ancillary inspections.
Driveway Material::
Concrete |
Walkway Materials::
Concrete |
1.0 |
GEN<Grounds
|
Aerial view.
![]() 1.0 Item 1(Picture) Back view
![]() 1.0 Item 2(Picture) Front view
|
1.1 |
Driveway
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the driveway. The Inspector
observed few deficiencies in the condition of the walkway. Uneven surfaces present in the edge of the walkway at the time of the inspection have created trip hazards that should be corrected. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 1.1 Item 1(Picture) Driveway
![]() 1.1 Item 2(Picture) Driveway/walkway uneven at edges
|
1.2 |
Porch
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the porch.
![]() 1.2 Item 1(Picture) Front porch
![]() 1.2 Item 2(Picture) Front porch
|
1.3 |
Fences, Gates, and Boundary Walls
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the fences at the time of the
inspection.
Gates were sticking at the time of the inspection and need adjustment. Some fence boards were damaged/not attached and should be repaired. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 1.3 Item 1(Picture) Fence gate latch needs adjustment
![]() 1.3 Item 2(Picture) Damaged fence board
![]() 1.3 Item 3(Picture) Unfastened fence board
|
Exterior wall-covering Material:
Cementicious Siding |
Exterior Doors::
Metal |
2.0 |
Window Exteriors
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of window exteriors.
![]() 2.0 Item 1(Picture) Window exterior
![]() 2.0 Item 2(Picture) Window exterior
![]() 2.0 Item 3(Picture) Window exteriors
|
2.1 |
Door Exteriors
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of door exteriors. Inspection of door
exteriors typically includes examination of the following:
The front exterior door had damage to the weather strip/paint visible at the time of inspection. The Inspector recommends repair to prevent energy loss or damage associated with moisture intrusion. The rear door swells and sticks during the moister times of the year and should be adjusted to accommodate this expansion. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be completed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 2.1 Item 1(Picture) Rear door sticks when weather is moist
![]() 2.1 Item 2(Picture) Front door trim paint
![]() 2.1 Item 3(Picture) Front door weather strip damage
|
2.2 |
Cementicious Siding
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of cementicious lapped siding covering
exterior walls. This siding is of high durability and fire resistance. Inspection of cementicious
lapped siding typically includes visual examination of installation practices and general condition.
![]() 2.2 Item 1(Picture) Cementicious lapped siding
![]() 2.2 Item 2(Picture) Cementicious lapped siding
![]() 2.2 Item 3(Picture) Cementicious lapped siding
|
Water Supply Source::
Public Water Supply |
Water Distribution Pipes::
Cross-linked Polyethylene (PEX) |
Functional Flow:
All plumbing fixtures had functional flow |
Functional Drainage::
All plumbing fixtures had functional drainage |
Sewage System Type::
Public |
Drain Waste and Vent Pipe Materials::
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) |
Water Heater Fuel Type:
Electric |
Water Heater Type:
Tank (conventional) |
Gas Pipe Material::
Black Steel |
Type of Gas::
Natural Gas |
Sump Pump::
An operable sump pump was installed |
3.0 |
Source of Water
Comments: Inspected |
The home water was supplied from a public source and the meter is located to the left of the
driveway near the curb.
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the main water supply shut-off valve located in the garage on the south wall. It was not operated but was visually inspected. All plumbing fixtures in the home exhibited functional flow. ![]() 3.0 Item 1(Picture) Water meter
![]() 3.0 Item 2(Picture) Main water supply valve
|
3.1 |
Exterior Plumbing
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of exterior water faucets.
![]() 3.1 Item 1(Picture) Hose bib
|
3.2 |
Sewage and DWV Systems
Comments: Inspected |
The home was connected to the public sewage system. A main sewer pipe in the street that
served the community was gravity fed from the home sewer system through a main sewer pipe. At
the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the home
sewage disposal system. All plumbing fixtures in the home exhibited functional drainage.
![]() 3.2 Item 1(Picture) DWV cleanout
![]() 3.2 Item 2(Picture) DWV pipes
|
3.3 |
Electric Water Heater
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition or operation of the water heater.
![]() 3.3 Item 1(Picture) Electric water heater
![]() 3.3 Item 2(Picture) Electric water heater/expansion tank
|
3.4 |
Sump Pump
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the sump
pump, it was operated.
![]() 3.4 Item 1(Picture) Sump pump/piping
![]() 3.4 Item 2(Picture) Sump pump/piping
|
The General Home Inspection is limited to identifying common electrical requirements and deficiencies. Conditions indicating the need for a more comprehensive inspection will be referred to a qualified electrical contractor.Inspection of the home electrical system typically includes visual inspection of the following:service drop: conductors, weatherhead, and service mast; electric meter exterior; service panel and sub-panels; service and equipment grounding; system and component bonding; and visible branch wiring: receptacles (representative number), switches, lighting
Ground Fault Circuit Interruptor (GFCI) Protection::
YES |
Electrical Service Conductors::
Underground service |
Service Panel Ampacity::
200 amps |
Service Panel Type::
Load Center |
Service Disconnect Location::
At Service Panel |
Service Disconnect Type::
Breaker |
Arc Fault Circuit Interruptor (AFCI) Protection::
YES |
4.0 |
GFCI/AFCI Electrical Receptacles
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
Electrical receptacles in the basement had ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection,
most of which responded to testing in a satisfactory manner. The inspector tested a
representative number of accessible receptacles only. An exterior Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI) electrical receptacle at the rear of the home responded to the testing device but failed to reset properly and stay reset. This receptacle should be replaced with a new GFCI receptacle. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be completed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 4.0 Item 1(Picture) Rear GFCI failed to reset properly
![]() 4.0 Item 2(Picture) Bathroom GFCI
|
4.1 |
Conventional Electrical Receptacles (Interior)
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the grounded electrical receptacles in
the home. In accordance with the Standards of Practice, the inspector tested a representative
number of accessible outlets only.
![]() 4.1 Item 1(Picture) Grounded electrical receptacles
![]() 4.1 Item 2(Picture) Grounded electrical receptacles
|
4.2 |
Lighting
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of lighting.
![]() 4.2 Item 1(Picture) Interior lighting
![]() 4.2 Item 2(Picture) Exterior lighting
|
4.3 |
Switches
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of electrical switches tested in the
home. In accordance with the Standards of Practice, the inspector tested a representative
number of accessible switches only. The inspector observed a slow to respond switch in the the main floor bathroom that may be defective or installed incorrectly and should be repaired. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be completed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 4.3 Item 1(Picture) Interior switches
![]() 4.3 Item 2(Picture) Interior switch
![]() 4.3 Item 3(Picture) Main floor bathroom light switch responds slowly and may be defective
|
4.4 |
Electric Meter
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the electric meter. Electric meters are
installed by utility companies to measure home electrical consumption.
![]() 4.4 Item 1(Picture) Electric meter
|
4.5 |
Panel Cabinet, Cover
Comments: Inspected |
All components visible in the service panel appeared to be in serviceable condition at the time
of the inspection. Inspection of the main service panel typically includes examination of the
following:
![]() 4.5 Item 1(Picture) Service panel
![]() 4.5 Item 2(Picture) Service panel breakers
|
Method of inspection::
Drone with camera |
The roof style was::
Gable |
Primary roof-covering type::
3-tab Fiberglass Asphalt Shingle |
Drainage system description::
Gutters and downspouts installed |
5.0 |
Drainage System
Comments: Inspected, Monitor, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the roof drainage system. Debris visible in the gutters at the time of the inspection should be removed to encourage proper drainage. The front porch downspout designed to discharge roof drainage was damaged to an extent that may limit its ability to function as designed. This condition can result in excessively high moisture levels in soil at the foundation and can cause damage related to soil/foundation movement. Excessive moisture levels in soil near the foundation can effect the ability of the soil to support the weight of the structure above and can cause damage related to soil/foundation movement. The Inspector recommends repair to help protect the home structure. All work should be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 5.0 Item 1(Picture) Roof drainage discharge spout damaged
![]() 5.0 Item 2(Picture) Gutter debris
|
5.1 |
Plumbing and Combustion Vents
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of inspection all roof penetrations, including plumbing and combustion vents were
functioning as designed.
![]() 5.1 Item 1(Picture) DWV pipes
![]() 5.1 Item 2(Picture) DWV pipes
![]() 5.1 Item 3(Picture) DWV pipes
|
5.2 |
Asphalt Composition Shingle
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the installation of asphalt
composition shingles covering this roof.
![]() 5.2 Item 1(Picture) Asphalt composition shingles
![]() 5.2 Item 2(Picture) Asphalt composition shingles
![]() 5.2 Item 3(Picture) Asphalt composition shingles
![]() 5.2 Item 4(Picture) Asphalt composition shingles
|
Walls and Ceilings::
Drywall |
Floor Covering Materials::
Carpet Tile Composite Flooring |
Interior Doors::
Hollow |
Window Material::
Vinyl |
Window Glazing::
Double-pane |
Window Operation::
Single-hung Sliding Fixed |
Cabinets::
Veneer on MDF |
Smoke/CO Detectors::
Smoke detectors installed (hardwired) Carbon monoxide detector(s) installed |
6.0 |
Smoke/CO/Radon Detectors
Comments: Inspected |
Radon Test Result - No Action Required
7-6-2022 Radon Reading Update The radon monitor was placed in an adequate location on the main floor in the master bedroom closet near the crawlspace access and collected data over a 5 day, 06 hour and 37 minute time period. The peak value reading was 1.38 pCi/L and the one day average was 0.51 pCi/L. Radon levels in the home fluctuate greatly based on environmental and home ventilation conditions. The following actions are recommended based upon long term averages: 0-2 pCi/L continue to monitor 2-4 pCi/L ventilate and monitor 4+ pCi/L contact a professional to take mitigation action and continue to monitor The Inspector recommends continuous monitoring throughout the year to determine annual indoor air quality and potential long term exposures. Continuous radon monitors are an inexpensive purchase that can confirm safe radon levels of the home.
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), recommends replacing smoke and heat alarms
every ten years, and replacing carbon monoxide and combination alarms every seven to ten
years (depending on your model) to benefit from the latest technology upgrades ![]() 6.0 Item 1(Picture) Radon test result
![]() 6.0 Item 2(Picture) Smoke detector
|
6.1 |
Floors
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of most floors in the home.
The home had general minor carpet wear on major paths of travel. All work should be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 6.1 Item 1(Picture) Nail protruding in master bathroom closet
![]() 6.1 Item 2(Picture) Tile flooring
![]() 6.1 Item 3(Picture) Floor creaks under foot near office area
![]() 6.1 Item 4(Picture) Composite flooring
|
6.2 |
Windows
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed few deficiencies in the interior condition
and operation of windows. Sealant around windows is cracked and needs to be repaired/replaced to prevent air leakage at the windows. Homes without an effective seal against air leakage at windows will incur higher annual heating/cooling costs and occupants may experience lower comfort levels than with a similar home with windows that are effectively sealed. The trim facade has fallen from the living room blinds and needs to be repaired. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 6.2 Item 1(Picture) Interior window sills need sealant
![]() 6.2 Item 2(Picture) Interior window sills need sealant
![]() 6.2 Item 3(Picture) Trim facade has fallen off
|
6.3 |
Walls
Comments: Inspected, Monitor, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the home walls. Walls in the laundry room exhibited vertical and horizontal cracking consistent with compression cracking caused by closure of gaps between wall framing members. Additional settling of wall framing would typically continue until the framing reached moisture equilibrium after which the wall would become stable. This appears to be isolated and not likely a structural concern. However this should be repaired for aesthetic reasons. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 6.3 Item 1(Picture) Wall crack
![]() 6.3 Item 2(Picture) Interior wall
|
6.4 |
Interior Trim
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of interior
trim components. Inspection of interior trim typically includes examination of the following:
Some baseboard trim was missing in the stairwell to the 2nd floor. The Inspector recommends that replacement trim be installed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 6.4 Item 1(Picture) Stair trim missing
![]() 6.4 Item 2(Picture) Stair trim missing
![]() 6.4 Item 3(Picture) Stair trim missing
|
6.5 |
Doors
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the interior doors. Difficulty in operating the sliding closet doors in the bedroom appeared to be caused by worn or out-of-adjustment rollers. The Inspector recommends service by a qualified contractor. The interior doors in the home have rough surfaces that catch on clothing and should be repaired. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 6.5 Item 1(Picture) Doors have rough surfaces
![]() 6.5 Item 2(Picture) Door does not slide
|
6.6 |
Ceilings
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the home ceilings. Protruding nail heads visible in ceilings in the home appeared to be the result of framing members shrinking after original construction was complete. Framing lumber is often installed with a relatively high moisture content and typically shrinks as it dries. Once framing has reached moisture equilibrium with the homesite environment, framing will become stable and nail pops can be repaired without concern that they will reappear. The time required to reach stability depends on the moisture content of framing materials at the time of original construction and humidity levels at the homesite. The time frame may vary between one and two years in many environments. The Inspector recommends repair by a qualified drywall or painting contractor once the condition appears stable. ![]() 6.6 Item 1(Picture) Nail pops
![]() 6.6 Item 2(Picture) Nail pops
![]() 6.6 Item 3(Picture) Nail pops
|
Exhaust Fans:
Fan only |
Sink::
Sink in a cabinet |
Toilet Type::
Low-volume flush (1.6 gal. [6 litres] or less) |
Bathub::
Bathtub with shower |
Shower::
Walk-in |
Cabinets::
Veneer on MDF Laminate |
7.0 |
Cabinets
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of the
bathroom cabinets and countertops. The bathroom countertops had damaged/cracked backsplash sealant. This condition will allow moisture intrusion damaging the cabinetry and/or wall structure. Recommend application of an appropriate sealant to prevent moisture intrusion. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 7.0 Item 1(Picture) Cabinets and countertops
![]() 7.0 Item 2(Picture) Backsplash sealant needed
|
7.1 |
Sinks
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the sink. It
had functional flow and drainage when tested.
![]() 7.1 Item 1(Picture) Sink flow
![]() 7.1 Item 2(Picture) Sink drainage
|
7.2 |
Toilet
Comments: Inspected |
The toilets were flushed and operated in a satisfactory manner.
![]() 7.2 Item 1(Picture) Toilet
![]() 7.2 Item 2(Picture) Toilet
![]() 7.2 Item 3(Picture) Toilet
|
7.3 |
Ventilation
Comments: Inspected |
The bathrooms had an operable source of ventilation.
![]() 7.3 Item 1(Picture) Ventilation
![]() 7.3 Item 2(Picture) Ventilation
|
7.4 |
Bathtub
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of bathtub components. Bathtub
inspection includes testing for:
![]() 7.4 Item 1(Picture) Bathtub/shower
|
7.5 |
Shower
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
Most shower components in the bathroom appeared to be in serviceable condition at the time
of the inspection. Inspection of the shower typically includes:
The shower had functional flow and functional drainage at the time of the inspection. Transitions between the shower basin and the walls/flooring appeared to be old/cracked/deteriorated/missing and in need of sealant maintenance. This area is actively leaking onto the floor when the shower is used. The Inspector recommends application of an appropriate sealant to the entire basin to avoid moisture damage to adjacent home structure materials. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 7.5 Item 1(Picture) Shower
![]() 7.5 Item 2(Picture) Shower sealant needed/active leaking
![]() 7.5 Item 3(Picture) Shower sealant needed/active leaking
|
Cabinets::
Veneer on MDF |
Countertop Material::
Composite |
Range::
Gas |
Range Hood::
Vents to exterior Fan Operable Lights inoperable |
Dishwasher::
Present, not inspected |
Refrigerator::
Inspected |
Dishwasher Anti-siphon method::
Air gap installed |
8.0 |
Cabinets
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of kitchen cabinets and countertops. The kitchen corner cabinet has a broken shelf that needs repair. In the kitchen, countertops had no backsplash sealant. The Inspector recommends application of an appropriate sealant to prevent damage to the cabinet and wall structure from moisture intrusion. The Inspector recommends that all repair/replacement work be performed by a qualified contractor. ![]() 8.0 Item 1(Picture) Cabinets and countertops
![]() 8.0 Item 2(Picture) Backsplash sealant needed
![]() 8.0 Item 3(Picture) Cabinet shelf damage
|
8.1 |
Range Hood
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The exhaust vent of the range hood discharged exhaust to the home exterior. Range hood lights were inoperable. The bulb may be burned out, or there may be a problem with the switch, wiring or light fixture. If after replacing the bulb the light fixture still does not respond, the Inspector recommends service by a qualified contractor. ![]() 8.1 Item 1(Picture) Range hood vent
![]() 8.1 Item 2(Picture) Hood vent/microwave lights did not respond
|
8.2 |
Range
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition or operation
of the gas range. The self-cleaning feature was not tested. Inspection of gas ranges is limited to
basic functions, such as testing of the range-top burners, and bake/broil features of the oven. Range top rubber grate bumper was missing. ![]() 8.2 Item 1(Picture) Gas range missing rubber grate bumper
![]() 8.2 Item 2(Picture) Oven
|
8.3 |
Sinks
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the sink. It
had functional flow and drainage when tested.
![]() 8.3 Item 1(Picture) Sink flow
![]() 8.3 Item 2(Picture) Sink drainage
|
8.4 |
Refrigerator
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the
refrigerator.
![]() 8.4 Item 1(Picture) Refrigerator
![]() 8.4 Item 2(Picture) Refrigerator
![]() 8.4 Item 3(Picture) Freezer
|
8.5 |
Dishwasher
Comments: Not Inspected |
In accordance with the Standards of Practice the dishwasher was not operated. The Inspector
disclaims its proper operation.
![]() 8.5 Item 1(Picture) Dishwasher exterior
![]() 8.5 Item 2(Picture) Dishwasher Interior
|
Dryer Power::
Electric |
Dryer Vent::
Smooth-bore metal (UL-approved) Aluminum expanding vent |
Dryer 240-volt electrical receptacle::
Installed |
9.0 |
GEN<Receptacles,Switches,Connections
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the laundry bibs, electrical
receptacles, or dryer ventilation.
The laundry room lint trap was not trimmed. Excessive lint accumulation can increase drying time and shorten the dryer’s lifespan. The Inspector recommends regularly cleaning the vent. ![]() 9.0 Item 1(Picture) Lint trap missing trim
![]() 9.0 Item 2(Picture) Dryer vent
![]() 9.0 Item 3(Picture) Laundry bibs
![]() 9.0 Item 4(Picture) Ventilation
|
Heating System Type::
Gas-fired Furnace (high efficiency) Forced-air distribution Heat Pump Forced Air (also provides cool air) |
Energy Source::
Natural gas Electric |
Number of Heat Systems (excluding wood)::
One |
Heating/Cooling Ducts::
Insulated |
Air Filter::
Disposable |
Air Filter Location::
Behind return air registers |
10.0 |
Furnace
Comments: Inspected, Monitor |
The furnace and the air-conditioning were controlled by a programmable thermostat. Heating
and cooling costs can be reduced by programming the thermostat to raise and lower home
temperatures at key times.
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of this furnace. Inspection of the furnace typically includes examination/operation of the following:
The Filter is dirty and requires maintenance. The average recommended service interval is approximately every three months depending on outdoor air quality. The entire system should be serviced annually. The Inspector observed the filter at the return air/blower compartment. ![]() 10.0 Item 1(Picture) Insulated ducts
![]() 10.0 Item 2(Picture) Furnace main gas valve
![]() 10.0 Item 3(Picture) Furnace
![]() 10.0 Item 4(Picture) Furnace
![]() 10.0 Item 5(Picture) HVAC supply on cool
![]() 10.0 Item 6(Picture) HVAC supply on cool
![]() 10.0 Item 7(Picture) Return air vent/dirty filter
![]() 10.0 Item 8(Picture) Thermostat
|
10.1 |
Fuel, Piping and Support
Comments: Inspected |
The pipes supplying fuel to the furnace appeared to be properly configured and in serviceable
condition at the time of the inspection.
![]() 10.1 Item 1(Picture) Gas meter
|
Number of cooling systems (excluding window AC):
One |
Cooling System Type::
Split System (indoor and outdoor components |
Cooling Equipment Energy Source::
Electricity |
11.0 |
HVAC Condensor
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the air-conditioning system.
![]() 11.0 Item 1(Picture) Condensor/line set/disconnect
![]() 11.0 Item 2(Picture) Condensor
|
Much of the home structure is hidden behind exterior and interior roof, floor, wall, and ceiling coverings, or is buried underground. Because the General Home Inspection is limited to visual and non-invasive methods, this report may not identify all structural deficiencies. Identification of portions of the wall structure not directly visible requires logical assumptions on the part of the Inspector that are based on the Inspectors past experience and knowledge of common building practices.
Upon observing indications that structural problems may exist that are not readily visible, or the evaluation of which lies beyond the Inspector's expertise, the inspector may recommend evaluation or testing by a specialist that may include invasive measures, which would require homeowner permission.
Method used to Inspect Crawlspace::
Inspector entered the crawlspace |
Foundation Configuration::
Crawlspace |
Foundation Method/Materials::
Poured concrete foundation walls |
Main Floor Structure- Perimeter Bearing::
Rests on top of foundation wall |
Main Floor Structure- Intermediate Support::
Wood beam girder Wood posts Poured concrete pad |
12.0 |
GEN<Crawlspace
Comments: Inspected, Repair/Replace |
The Inspector observed few deficiencies in the condition of this crawlspace. Inspection of the
crawlspace typically includes examination of the following:
A radon mitigation system was in place in the crawlspace. Confirmation of proper system installation and operation lies beyond the scope the General Home Inspection. The Inspector recommends inspection by a certified/qualified contractor. No soil cover was installed at the time of the inspection. Soil covers help reduce humidity levels in crawlspaces by limiting moisture evaporation into the air from soil. Reducing humidity levels can help prevent conditions that encourage mold growth and wood decay. ![]() 12.0 Item 1(Picture) Crawlspace access
![]() 12.0 Item 2(Picture) Vapor barrier missing
![]() 12.0 Item 3(Picture) Vapor barrier
![]() 12.0 Item 4(Picture) Passive radon mitigation
|
12.1 |
Foundation
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the visible
portions of the poured concrete foundation walls.
![]() 12.1 Item 1(Picture) Foundation
![]() 12.1 Item 2(Picture) Foundation vents need covers for cold months
![]() 12.1 Item 3(Picture) Foundation
|
12.2 |
Floor Structure
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the
visible floor structure. Inspection of the floor structure typically includes examination of the
condition and proper installation of the following:
![]() 12.2 Item 1(Picture) Intermediate floor support
![]() 12.2 Item 2(Picture) Intermediate floor support
![]() 12.2 Item 3(Picture) Intermediate floor supports
|
12.3 |
Thermal Envelope
Comments: Inspected |
At the time of the inspection, the Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the visible
portions of the floor insulation that included fiberglass batts.
![]() 12.3 Item 1(Picture) Floor insulation
![]() 12.3 Item 2(Picture) Floor insulation
|
Attic inspected from::
Inside the attic |
Attic thermal insulation material::
Blown-in Fiberglass |
Approximate attic thermal insulation depth::
19-24 inches |
Roof Structure Ventilation::
Attic ventilation appeared sufficient |
Roof Framing Type::
Combination of Conventional Framing and Roof Trusses |
Roof Sheathing Material::
Oriented Strand Board (OSB) |
Roof structure ventilation device type::
Roof vents Soffit vents |
13.0 |
Attic Access
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector evaluated the attic from inside the attic space.
![]() 13.0 Item 1(Picture) Attic access
|
13.1 |
Roof Ventilation
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of roof structure ventilation. Attic
ventilation appeared to be sufficient.
![]() 13.1 Item 1(Picture) Roof vent
![]() 13.1 Item 2(Picture) Soffit vent
![]() 13.1 Item 3(Picture) Roof vents
|
13.2 |
Thermal Envelope
Comments: Inspected |
The inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the thermal insulation at the time of the
inspection. The attic floor insulation depth averaged approximately 19 to 24 inches.
![]() 13.2 Item 1(Picture) Blown in fiberglass insulation
![]() 13.2 Item 2(Picture) Blown in fiberglass insulation
|
13.3 |
Roof Framing
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the roof framing and sheathing at the time of the
inspection.
![]() 13.3 Item 1(Picture) Roof framing and sheathing
![]() 13.3 Item 2(Picture) Roof framing and sheathing
![]() 13.3 Item 3(Picture) Roof framing and sheathing
![]() 13.3 Item 4(Picture) Roof framing and sheathing
|
Garage Vehicle Door Type::
Double |
Number of Vehicle Doors::
1 |
Number of Automatic Openers::
1 |
Vehicle Door Automatic Reverse::
Installed and operating correctly |
14.0 |
Fire Separation
Comments: Inspected |
The walls and ceilings separating the garage from the home living space appeared to meet
generally-accepted current standards for firewalls. Firewalls are designed to resist the spread of a
fire which starts in the garage for a certain length of time in order to give the home's occupants
adequate time to escape.
![]() 14.0 Item 1(Picture) Fire separation door
![]() 14.0 Item 2(Picture) Fire separation
|
14.1 |
Vehicle Doors
Comments: Inspected |
The Inspector observed no deficiencies in the condition of the overhead vehicle doors. The
automatic garage door opener responded to the controls. The photoelectric sensor designed to
activate the automatic-reverse at the overhead garage door responded to testing as designed.
![]() 14.1 Item 1(Picture) Garage door opener
![]() 14.1 Item 2(Picture) Garage door
|